•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A00101 Summary:

BILL NOA00101A
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00054-A
 
SPONSORDinowitz
 
COSPNSRPaulin, Lee, Otis, Simon, Seawright, Weprin, Septimo, Hevesi, Rosenthal, Ra, Davila, Stirpe, Bores, Lavine, Gonzalez-Rojas, Glick, Shimsky, Lucas, Jacobson, Zinerman, Levenberg, Lunsford, Burdick, Bichotte Hermelyn, Ramos, Barrett, Zaccaro, Reyes, Colton, McMahon, Simone, Cruz, Tapia, Gandolfo, Slater, Jones, Clark, Woerner, Alvarez, Sayegh, DeStefano, Berger, Cunningham, Kelles, Cook, Raga, Jensen, Blankenbush, Novakhov, Buttenschon, Lupardo, Gallahan, Pheffer Amato, Stern, Angelino, De Los Santos, Braunstein, Chandler-Waterman, Rozic, Rajkumar, Santabarbara, Taylor, Steck, Anderson, Manktelow, Sempolinski, Schiavoni, Epstein, Kay, Durso, Kim, Hooks, Wright, McDonald, Lasher, Griffin, Kassay, Wieder, Beephan, Maher, Bailey, Chang, Torres, Burroughs, Yeger, Jackson, Carroll P, Benedetto, Eachus, Rivera, Molitor
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §130.05, Pen L
 
Prohibits the use of intoxication of the victim as a defense in sex crimes where the victim is under the extreme influence of any substance which renders them incapable of appraising or controlling such victim's conduct and incapable of clearly expressing lack of consent.
Go to top    

A00101 Actions:

BILL NOA00101A
 
01/08/2025referred to codes
05/28/2025reported referred to rules
06/09/2025amend (t) and recommit to rules
06/09/2025print number 101a
Go to top

A00101 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A101A
 
SPONSOR: Dinowitz
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the penal law, in relation to prohibiting the use of the intoxication of a victim as a defense to a criminal charge for sex crimes   PURPOSE: To allow sex crimes charges to be brought in cases where the victim had become voluntarily intoxicated if a reasonable person in the defendant's position should have known that the victim was incapable of giving consent due to that intoxication.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section one of the bill amends paragraph (d) and adds paragraph (e) to subdivision 2 of § 130.05 of the penal law. Paragraph (d) provides for the inclusion that for sex offenses a lack of consent occurs when the offense charged is sexual misconduct as defined in subdivisions one, two and three of section 130.20 of the penal law(an actor engages in sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct, or anal sexual conduct with another person without receiving such person's consent)and the victim clearly expressed that he or she did not consent to engage in such act, and a reasonable person in the actor's situation would have understood such person's words and acts as an expression of lack of consent to such act under all the circumstances. Paragraph (e) adds that for sex offenses a lack of consent occurs where the offense charged is sexual misconduct as defined in subdivisions one, two and three of section 130,20 of the penal law (an actor engages in sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct, or anal sexual conduct with another person without receiving such person's consent), rape in the third degree as defined in subdivision seven, eight or nine of section 130.25 (an actor engages in sexual intercourse with another person with- out such person's consent where such lack of consent is by reason of some factor other than incapacity to consent), or a crime formerly defined in subdivision three of section 130.40 of this article (an actor engages in oral sexual conduct or anal sexual conduct with another person without such person's consent where such lack of consent is by reason of some factor other than incapacity to consent), in addition to forcible compulsion, circumstances under which, at the time of the act of vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual contact, or anal sexual contact, the victim was clearly under the influence of any drug, intoxicant, or other substance to such a degree which rendered the victim incapable of controlling such person's conduct and incapable of clearly expressing lack of consent and such condition was known or reasonably should have been known to a person in the actor's situation. Section two of the bill provides the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Currently, victims of sex crimes in cases where the abused individual voluntarily consumes alcohol and/or drugs to the point of intoxication are not able to seek adequate recourse. The penal law, in its definition of mental incapacitation, only recognizes cases where a substance is administered involuntarily. Therefore, prosecutors are limited in their ability to bring about charges involving cases where the abused individ- ual voluntary consumed intoxicating substances. As we know, mental incapacitation and the subsequent inability to consent to sexual acts is not dependent on whether an individual volun- tarily or involuntarily consumed an intoxicating substance.When such arbitrary determinations are made, we advance a culture that denies a voice to victims and further denies access to a criminal justice system meant to support, not deny sexual abuse survivors the justice they deserve.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2024: A.1065-A - Rules/ S.4555-3 - Passed Senate 2023: A.1065 - Codes /S.4555-A - Passed Senate 2021-22: A.5519-A - Rules 2019-20: A.8364-C - Codes / S.6679-C - Passed Senate   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately
Go to top

A00101 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         101--A
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                       (Prefiled)
 
                                     January 8, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of A. DINOWITZ, PAULIN, LEE, OTIS, SIMON, SEAWRIGHT,
          WEPRIN, SEPTIMO, HEVESI, ROSENTHAL, RA, DAVILA, STIRPE, BORES, LAVINE,
          GONZALEZ-ROJAS, GLICK, SHIMSKY, LUCAS, JACOBSON, ZINERMAN,  LEVENBERG,
          LUNSFORD,  BURDICK, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, RAMOS, BARRETT, ZACCARO, REYES,
          COLTON, McMAHON, SIMONE, CRUZ, TAPIA, GANDOLFO, SLATER, JONES,  CLARK,
          WOERNER, ALVAREZ, SAYEGH, DeSTEFANO, BERGER, CUNNINGHAM, KELLES, COOK,
          RAGA,  JENSEN,  BLANKENBUSH, NOVAKHOV, BUTTENSCHON, LUPARDO, GALLAHAN,
          PHEFFER AMATO,    STERN,    ANGELINO,    DE LOS SANTOS,    BRAUNSTEIN,
          CHANDLER-WATERMAN,   ROZIC,  RAJKUMAR,  SANTABARBARA,  TAYLOR,  STECK,
          ANDERSON, MANKTELOW, SEMPOLINSKI, SCHIAVONI, EPSTEIN, KAY, DURSO, KIM,
          HOOKS, WRIGHT, McDONALD, LASHER,  GRIFFIN,  KASSAY,  WIEDER,  BEEPHAN,
          MAHER,  BAILEY,  CHANG, TORRES, BURROUGHS, YEGER, JACKSON, P. CARROLL,
          BENEDETTO, EACHUS, RIVERA, MOLITOR -- read once and  referred  to  the
          Committee  on Codes -- reported and referred to the Committee on Rules
          -- Rules Committee discharged,  bill  amended,  ordered  reprinted  as
          amended and recommitted to the Committee on Rules

        AN ACT to amend the penal law, in relation to prohibiting the use of the
          intoxication  of  a  victim  as a defense to a criminal charge for sex
          crimes
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Paragraph  (d)  of subdivision 2 of section 130.05 of the
     2  penal law, as amended by chapter 23 of the laws of 2024, is amended  and
     3  a new paragraph (e) is added to read as follows:
     4    (d)  Where  the  offense  charged  is  sexual misconduct as defined in
     5  subdivisions one, two and three of section 130.20,  rape  in  the  third
     6  degree as defined in subdivision seven, eight or nine of section 130.25,
     7  or  a  crime  formerly defined in subdivision three of section 130.40 of
     8  this article, in addition to forcible  compulsion,  circumstances  under
     9  which,  at  the  time  of the act of vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD00357-02-5

        A. 101--A                           2
 
     1  contact or anal sexual contact, the victim clearly expressed that [he or
     2  she] such victim did not consent to engage in such act, and a reasonable
     3  person in the actor's situation  would  have  understood  such  person's
     4  words and acts as an expression of lack of consent to such act under all
     5  the circumstances[.];
     6    (e)  Where  the  offense  charged  is  sexual misconduct as defined in
     7  subdivisions one, two and three of section 130.20,  rape  in  the  third
     8  degree  as  defined  in  subdivisions  seven,  eight  or nine of section
     9  130.25, or a crime formerly defined  in  subdivision  three  of  section
    10  130.40  of  this  article,  in  addition to forcible compulsion, circum-
    11  stances under which, at the time of the act of vaginal  sexual  contact,
    12  oral sexual contact or anal sexual contact, the victim was clearly under
    13  the  influence  of  any  drug,  intoxicant, or other substance to such a
    14  degree which rendered the victim incapable of controlling such  victim's
    15  conduct  and  incapable  of  clearly expressing lack of consent and such
    16  condition was known or reasonably should have been known to a person  in
    17  the actor's situation.
    18    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top